EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Framework for the Heterogeneity and Ecosystem Services of Farmland Landscapes: An Integrative Review

Xiaohui Wang, Yao Wu, Kiril Manevski, Manqi Fu, Xiaogang Yin and Fu Chen
Additional contact information
Xiaohui Wang: College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Yao Wu: College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Kiril Manevski: Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
Manqi Fu: College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Xiaogang Yin: College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Fu Chen: College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 22, 1-17

Abstract: It is essential for the sustainable development of farmland landscapes to balance ecosystem service trade-offs and improve resource use efficiency during crop production. Thus, an integrative and concept-centric qualitative approach was applied by combining the patch–corridor–matrix model of landscape ecology and the crop layout theory of farming systems into a theoretical framework. The thesis concludes that a farmland landscape comprises three compositions: the crop (the main crop and the service crop), the non-crop, and the non-vegetation, leading to heterogeneous composition and configuration. The main crop, typically displayed as large patches with a high distribution ratio, provides most of the provisioning services, while the service crop performs many regulation services. The non-crop and non-vegetation compositions often appear as strips that can connect different patches as corridors and support the provisioning services of crops. Non-crop compositions mainly focus on support and regulation services, while non-vegetation compositions support farming operations. Further research is needed in several respects, including the ecological impact and ecosystem service trade-offs of the composition and configuration heterogeneity, and strategies for the adoption of cropping systems and agronomic measures at the landscape scale, which are essential to the evaluation, improvement, and redesign of farmland landscapes.

Keywords: farmland landscape; crop layout; composition; configuration; ecosystem services (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12463/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12463/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12463-:d:677082

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12463-:d:677082