The Impact on Ecosystem Services and the Satisfaction Therewith of Community Forest Management in Northern Thailand

Siriluck Thammanu, Hee Han, E. M. B. P. Ekanayake, Yoonkoo Jung and Joosang Chung
Additional contact information
Siriluck Thammanu: Royal Forest Department, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Hee Han: Department of Forest Policy and Economics, National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul 02455, Korea
E. M. B. P. Ekanayake: Department of Forest Conservation, Sampathpaya, Battaramulla 10120, Sri Lanka
Yoonkoo Jung: Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
Joosang Chung: Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 23, 1-31

Abstract: Forest ecosystems provide myriad services that are beneficial to local livelihoods. Successful community forest management (CFM) enhances the provision, overall benefit, and effectiveness of the regulation of ecosystem services and contributes to forest conservation efforts. The study area was a deciduous forest in the Ban Mae Chiang Rai Lum Community Forest, which is located in Pa Mae Phrik National Forest Reserve in Thailand’s northern province of Lampang. A systematic sampling of the forest area was conducted, and survey plots were established. A field survey documented 197 plant species from 62 families. A questionnaire that focused on CFM engagement behavior and ecosystem service satisfaction levels was used to interview household representatives. The study found that levels of engagement and the effectiveness of forest management were directly related; increased CFM effectiveness leads to improved ecosystem services. Participation in CFM can improve ecosystem services and enhance livelihoods. Specifically, participation in decision making, forest fire management, check dam construction, benefit sharing, and in forming effective forest regulations positively impacted ecosystem services. In contrast, employing forest patrols adversely affected those services. This knowledge is useful for identifying policies and practices that can maximize ecosystem services to enhance livelihoods and safeguard the forest’s vitality.

Keywords: forest conservation; participatory decision making; deciduous forests; non-timber forest products; questionnaire (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13474/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13474/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13474-:d:695913

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().