The Influence of Habitat Changes on Elephant Mortality Associated with Human–Elephant Conflict: Identifying Areas of Concern in the North Central Dry Zone of Sri Lanka

Chase A. LaDue, Sarah M. Farinelli, Imira Eranda, Chandana Jayasinghe and Rajnish P. G. Vandercone
Additional contact information
Chase A. LaDue: Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
Sarah M. Farinelli: Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
Imira Eranda: Department of Biological Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Mihintale 50300, Sri Lanka
Chandana Jayasinghe: Department of Wildlife Conservation, Battaramulla 10120, Sri Lanka
Rajnish P. G. Vandercone: Department of Biological Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Mihintale 50300, Sri Lanka

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 24, 1-14

Abstract: Human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is becoming increasingly prevalent as human activity expands, and monitoring the impact of habitat quality on wildlife mortality related to HWC is critical for the well-being of wildlife and people. Using ten years of necropsies from free-ranging Asian elephants in the Northwestern Wildlife Region (NWR) of Sri Lanka, we quantified the effect of habitat quality on human–elephant conflict (HEC) (i.e., human-caused elephant mortality), hypothesizing that both artificial (e.g., forest cover loss) and natural (e.g., water availability, temperature) changes would be associated with elephant mortality. We collated necropsies from 348 elephants that died due to human activity from 2009 to 2018, comparing the results with data on forest cover loss, perennial water, rainfall, temperature, and human population sizes. Over the study period, we found that forest cover loss was significantly correlated with human-caused mortality in a district-specific manner. Similarly, access to perennial water and precipitation levels appeared to influence mortality, but not temperature, human population density, or percent land cover used for agriculture. We conducted emerging hot spot analyses to identify areas within the NWR that should be prioritized for protection, which included landscapes that are not currently protected (approximately 43% of the hot spots we identified). Similarly, areas that we identified as cold spots included many areas with minimal forest cover loss. Together, our results emphasize the impact that human activity can have on the measurable outcomes of HEC. We suggest that adaptive HWC management strategies that use retrospective analyses should inform any potential changes to the protection of vital wildlife habitats, such as the north central dry zone of Sri Lanka.

Keywords: anthropogenic activities; Asian elephant; crop-raiding; forest cover loss; emerging hot spot analysis; human–elephant conflict; spatiotemporal statistics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13707/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13707/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13707-:d:700494

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().