Barriers and Determinants of Active Commuting to School in Slovenia

Gregor Jurak, Maroje Sorić, Tjaša Ocvirk, Žan Luca Potočnik, Kaja Meh, Saša Đurić, Vedrana Sember and Gregor Starc
Additional contact information
Gregor Jurak: Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Maroje Sorić: Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Tjaša Ocvirk: Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Žan Luca Potočnik: Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Kaja Meh: Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Saša Đurić: General Education, Liberal Arts Department, American University of the Middle East, Egaila 54200, Kuwait
Vedrana Sember: Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Gregor Starc: Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 24, 1-11

Abstract: There is a growing body of literature reporting the health benefits of active commuting to school. This study investigated barriers and determinants of active commuting in children in Slovenia living within walking or cycling distance to school, i.e., 3 km. The sample consisted of 339 children (163 girls) aged 11–14 years who reported their mode of commuting, as well as their parents who described the socioeconomic environment of the family. Every third child in this study traveled to school exclusively by car/public transport, while every fifth participant used a passive means of transport when returning home from school. Potential household poverty, education of the mother and parental encouragement for physical activity were not associated with the commuting mode. In addition, conformist family barriers dominated among reasons for not choosing active commuting. A distance to school that was perceived to be too long was the most frequently cited barrier (72% of participants who passively commuted in both directions), followed by concern about being late for school (38% of participants who passively commute in one direction). Parents from all social strata who drive their children to school in either one or both directions while living in a walking or cycling range are a promising target population for active commuting interventions.

Keywords: passive commuting; traveling; driving; reasons; correlates (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13808/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13808/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13808-:d:702118

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().