Influence of Government Support on Proactive Environmental Strategies in Family Firms

Sonia Benito-Hernández, Cristina López-Cózar-Navarro and Tiziana Priede-Bergamini
Additional contact information
Sonia Benito-Hernández: Department of Agrarian Economics, Statistics and Business Management, Polytechnic University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Cristina López-Cózar-Navarro: Department of Agrarian Economics, Statistics and Business Management, Polytechnic University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Tiziana Priede-Bergamini: Departament of Economics and Business, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 24, 1-17

Abstract: Scholars have dedicated significant efforts to understanding the factors that influence the environmental strategy of a firm, in order to mitigate the negative impacts on the ecosystem. Learning more about the factors that encourage environmental behavior allows managers and policy makers to improve action and advance correctly in this direction. Despite this academic interest, the literature regarding family business has undertaken limited attention over the issue. Hence, our paper aims to advance in this line of research, by empirically examining the relationship between government support in family firms and their investment in environmental protection. Specifically, we intend to analyze whether the family nature, and the government financial support, influence their environmental strategy. The empirical analysis is developed with a sample of 1802 manufacturing firms in Spain, using a binary logistic regression to evaluate the existence of dependency relationships between the analyzed variables. The results show this dependency, confirming family nature and government support as significant factors for a proactive environmental strategy, funding the idea that family character positively affects environmental performance in line with the socio-emotional wealth approach, and these differences are greater if the company operates mainly in a local area. Likewise, family firms that receive state direct and indirect funding, invest more in environmental issues to mitigate negative external impacts. The practical implications of the results obtained are especially useful for managers of family businesses as well as for central governments and local institutions as a matter of reflection. To reduce administrative processes and costs for family firms in terms of direct and indirect support is of great importance, as an inadequate process may become a barrier to develop environmental strategies.

Keywords: family firms; proactive environmental strategies (PES); public policies; government support; socio emotional wealth (SEW) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13973/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13973/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13973-:d:704993

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().