Reuse of Filtering Facepiece Respirators in the COVID-19 Era
Joren Van Loon,
Lore Veelaert,
Sander Van Goethem,
Regan Watts,
Stijn Verwulgen,
Jouke C. Verlinden and
Els Du Bois
Additional contact information
Joren Van Loon: Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Lore Veelaert: Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Sander Van Goethem: Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Regan Watts: Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Stijn Verwulgen: Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Jouke C. Verlinden: Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Els Du Bois: Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 2, 1-20
Abstract:
The current COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an immense and unforeseen increase in demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) for healthcare workers worldwide. Amongst other products, respirator masks are crucial to protect the users against transmission of the virus. Decontamination and reuse of the existing stock could be a solution to the shortage of new respirators. Based upon existing studies, it was found that (I) a solid quality control method is essential to test product reuse, (II) in-depth evaluation of the different parts of the filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) should be considered, and (III) communication of the reuse cycle is essential to take track of the amount of reuse, as this is limited to ensure quality. The goal of this paper is two-fold. First, we identify the impact of decontamination on the different parts of the FFRs and how the quality control should be performed. Two different types of FFRs are analysed within this paper, resulting in the recommendation of combining quantitative respirator mask fit testing with a thorough sensory evaluation of decontaminated FFRs to qualify them for reuse. Secondly, the possibilities of communication of this reuse to the eventual user are mapped through in-depth reasoning.
Keywords: reuse; respirators; product shortage; quality control; COVID19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/797/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/797/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:797-:d:480912
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().