EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Forage Yield and Quality of Winter Canola–Pea Mixed Cropping System

Sultan Begna, Sangamesh Angadi, Abdel Mesbah, Rangappa Mathada Umesh and Michael Stamm
Additional contact information
Sultan Begna: USDA-ARS, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Science Center-Water Management Research Unit, Parlier, CA 93648, USA
Sangamesh Angadi: Agricultural Science Center at Clovis, New Mexico State University, Clovis, NM 88101, USA
Abdel Mesbah: Agricultural Science Center at Clovis, New Mexico State University, Clovis, NM 88101, USA
Rangappa Mathada Umesh: University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka 584104, India
Michael Stamm: Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 4, 1-12

Abstract: Forage crop–dairy farming is an important agro-industry across the world. This system is intensive with high-input forage crops. In the United States (US) Southern Great Plains, the system is based primarily on high-input annual grass-type crops in monocropping approaches and requires diverse low-input broadleaf crops for strengthening its sustainability. Winter canola ( Brassica napus L. ) and pea ( Pisum sativum L. ) have the potential to provide forage crop diversity options with high forage yields of high quality. Winter canola and pea in mono- and mixed-cropping approaches at seeding ratios of canola/pea at 0:100, 25:75, 50:50, 75:25, and 100:0 were studied for yield and quality in 2015 and 2016 in Clovis, New Mexico (NM). Averaged over years, canola–pea at 75:25 and 50:50 seeding ratios produced similar biomass forage yield but higher than mono-pea by 43% and canola–pea at 25:75 and mono-canola cropping by 8%. The land equivalent ratio of all mixed-cropping treatments exceeded 1.0, with canola–pea at the 50:50 seeding ratio recording a land equivalent ratio of 1.15, indicating that mixed-cropping systems are better users of land resources. Total digestible nutrients and relative feed value were higher in canola–pea mixed cropping than in mono-canola and mono-pea cropping. Canola–pea mixed cropping achieved high yields (13.3 to 14.7 Mg·ha −1 ) with improved forage quality, as well as improved crop and land productivity, with the potential to improve mechanical harvestability of vining pea, and strengthen the diversity and sustainability of forage crop–dairy farming in the Southern Great Plains under limited irrigation input of ~300 mm.

Keywords: annual broadleaf crops; diversity; forage yield; low input; mixed cropping; productivity; quality; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2122/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2122/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2122-:d:500526

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-18
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2122-:d:500526