Carbon Footprint Comparative Analysis of Cardboard and Plastic Containers Used for the International Transport of Spanish Tomatoes

Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira, Rosario Viñoles-Cebolla, María José Bastante-Ceca and Salvador F. Capuz-Rizo
Additional contact information
Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira: Project Management, Innovation and Sustainability (PRINS) Research Centre, Campus de Alcoy, Universitat Politècnica de València, Plaza Ferrándiz y Carbonell 1, 03801 Alcoy, Spain
Rosario Viñoles-Cebolla: Project Management, Innovation and Sustainability (PRINS) Research Centre, Campus de Valencia, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
María José Bastante-Ceca: Project Management, Innovation and Sustainability (PRINS) Research Centre, Campus de Valencia, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Salvador F. Capuz-Rizo: Project Management, Innovation and Sustainability (PRINS) Research Centre, Campus de Valencia, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 5, 1-28

Abstract: Agricultural packaging has a direct impact on the environmental performance of food. The carbon footprint (CF) of two of the most used packaging systems for international transport by road of fruit and vegetables is assessed and compared. Corrugated cardboard boxes (CCB) and polypropylene foldable boxes (PPB) in two different sizes are the object of this study. For the reusable boxes, three different scenarios are considered regarding the number of uses of each box (20, 50, and 100 uses). Product CF ISO 14067:2018 standard is applied, and requirements of ISO 14026:2017 and ISO 14044:2006 are met for a cradle-to-grave CF analysis. Product distribution and return of the empty box are the stages with the most significant impact for PPB over the manufacturing stage. CCB that does not have any returning stage or requirements of sanitation has its main impact in manufacturing. The comparison between both packaging systems of the same size, considering the functional unit and defined scope, points out CCB has a lower CF than PPB.

Keywords: greenhouse emissions; fruit and vegetable transport; fruit and vegetable packaging; cardboard boxes; polypropylene boxes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2552/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2552/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2552-:d:506642

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().