Subjective Well-Being as a Potential Policy Indicator in the Context of Urbanization and Forest Restoration
Takuya Takahashi,
Yukiko Uchida,
Hiroyuki Ishibashi and
Noboru Okuda
Additional contact information
Takuya Takahashi: School of Environmental Science, University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone 522-8533, Japan
Yukiko Uchida: Kokoro Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
Hiroyuki Ishibashi: Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto 603-8047, Japan
Noboru Okuda: Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto 603-8047, Japan
Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 6, 1-17
Abstract:
The enhancement of human well-being is one of the ultimate goals of resource management; however, it is not explicitly considered by forest policy indicators. Our previous studies examined how Japanese citizens in the Yasu River watershed of the Shiga Prefecture perceived subjective well-being related to forests (forest SWB). We found a negative correlation between forest SWB and forest ownership, suggesting dissatisfaction with the low profitability of forest ownership. Based on this result, in this paper, we argue that forest SWB can be an important indicator for policymaking in the context of urbanization and forest restoration and can complement existing forest indicators focusing mainly on physical and objective properties. First, we propose that a direct measurement of well-being (e.g., forest SWB) is preferable over an indirect measurement (e.g., GDP), for policymaking processes related to forests. Second, forest SWB can reflect the quality of our interactions with forests, which is important in urbanized societies which tend to have reduced experiences with nature. Third, forest SWB could identify inequalities between the users of forest ecosystem services and forest managers. Overall, forest SWB can be a holistic indicator to capture a variety of perspectives held by citizens.
Keywords: subjective well-being; happiness; policy indicator; forest policy; Japan (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3211/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3211/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3211-:d:517150
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().