Statistical Modeling for Spatial Groundwater Potential Map Based on GIS Technique
Aliasghar Azma,
Esmaeil Narreie,
Abouzar Shojaaddini,
Nima Kianfar,
Ramin Kiyanfar,
Seyed Mehdi Seyed Alizadeh and
Afshin Davarpanah
Additional contact information
Aliasghar Azma: College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Esmaeil Narreie: Department of Surveying Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Surveying Engineering, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman 76311-33131, Iran
Abouzar Shojaaddini: Soil Science Department, College of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 14115-336, Iran
Nima Kianfar: Faculty of Geodesy & Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 15875-4416, Iran
Ramin Kiyanfar: Department of Art and architecture, Payame Noor University, Shiraz 19395-4697, Iran
Seyed Mehdi Seyed Alizadeh: Petroleum Engineering Department, Australian College of Kuwait, West Mishref 13015, Kuwait
Afshin Davarpanah: Department of Mathematics, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3FL, UK
Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 7, 1-18
Abstract:
In arid and semi-arid lands like Iran water is scarce, and not all the wastewater can be treated. Hence, groundwater remains the primary and the principal source of water supply for human consumption. Therefore, this study attempted to spatially assess the groundwater potential in an aquifer in a semi-arid region of Iran using geographic information systems (GIS)-based statistical modeling. To this end, 75 agricultural wells across the Marvdasht Plain were sampled, and the water samples’ electrical conductivity (EC) was measured. To model the groundwater quality, multiple linear regression (MLR) and principal component regression (PCR) coupled with elven environmental parameters (soil-topographical parameters) were employed. The results showed that that soil EC (SEC) with Beta = 0.78 was selected as the most influential factor affecting groundwater EC (GEC). CaCO 3 of soil samples and length-steepness (LS factor) were the second and third effective parameters. SEC with r = 0.89 and CaCO 3 with r = 0.79 and LS factor with r = 0.69 were also characterized for PC1. According to performance criteria, the MLR model with R 2 = 0.94, root mean square error (RMSE) = 450 µScm −1 and mean error (ME) = 125 µScm −1 provided better results in predicting the GEC. The GEC map indicated that 16% of the Marvdasht groundwater was not suitable for agriculture. It was concluded that GIS, combined with statistical methods, could predict groundwater quality in the semi-arid regions.
Keywords: carbonate aquifer; digital elevation model; modeling; multivariate linear regression; principal component regression; groundwater quality assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3788/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3788/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3788-:d:526203
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().