EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Productivity-Enhancing Technologies. Can Consumer Choices Affect the Environmental Footprint of Beef?

Isaac A. Aboagye, Marcos R. C. Cordeiro, Tim A. McAllister and Kim H. Ominski
Additional contact information
Isaac A. Aboagye: Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, 201-12 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
Marcos R. C. Cordeiro: Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, 201-12 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
Tim A. McAllister: Lethbridge Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
Kim H. Ominski: Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, 201-12 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 8, 1-19

Abstract: Use of productivity-enhancing technologies (PET: growth hormones, ionophores, and beta-adrenergic agonists) to improve productivity has recently garnered public attention regarding environmentally sustainability, animal welfare, and human health. These consumer perceptions and increased demand for PET-free beef offer opportunities for the beef industry to target niche premium markets, domestically and internationally. However, there is a need to critically examine the trade-offs and benefits of beef raised with and without the use of PETs. This review contains a summary of the current literature regarding PET products available. The implications of their use on resource utilization, food safety and security, as well as animal health and welfare are discussed. Furthermore, we identified gaps in knowledge and future research questions related to the sustainability of these technologies in beef production systems. This work highlights the tradeoffs between environmental sustainability of beef and supplying the dietary needs of a growing population.

Keywords: productivity-enhancing technologies; environment sustainability; land use; water use; greenhouse gas; beef cattle (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4283/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4283/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4283-:d:534661

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4283-:d:534661