EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Sustainable Building Legislation and Incentives in Korea: A Case-Study-Based Comparison of Building New and Renovation

Fabrizio M. Amoruso, Min-Hee Sonn, Soyeon Chu and Thorsten Schuetze
Additional contact information
Fabrizio M. Amoruso: Department of Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea
Min-Hee Sonn: Department of Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea
Soyeon Chu: RE Urban and Architectural Design Workshop Co. Ltd., Seoul 04988, Korea
Thorsten Schuetze: Department of Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 9, 1-41

Abstract: More than one quarter of buildings in the Republic of Korea (RoK) are aged, approaching the end of their projected lifetimes, and require renovation. Aged buildings in the RoK are generally demolished, and new buildings with higher gross floor areas are realized on the same properties. That kind of redevelopment is associated with increased resource consumption, related greenhouse gas emissions, and other environmental impacts, as well as the generation of construction waste and the displacement of existing building tenants. This study analyzes the legislative framework for sustainable building in the RoK. Legally mandated basic standards for new buildings and renovation were analyzed, and differences were identified. Calculation methods and criteria for sustainable building incentives were determined. Incentive calculation methods were applied to three case-study buildings, which represented the three most common building types in Korea. Maximum building height, floor-to-area and building coverage ratios, and fiscal incentives for energy-efficient technical systems were quantified for new buildings and renovations. The findings identified the current legislative privileges for new buildings. To increase future sustainable building renovations, the criteria and tools for improving the existing legal framework, and economic feasibility, were identified and discussed.

Keywords: building standards analysis; sustainable building certification; building scenarios comparative analysis; sustainable building incentives; building renovation; building redevelopment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4889/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4889/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4889-:d:544184

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4889-:d:544184