Instrumentalization of a Model for the Evaluation of the Level of Satisfaction of Graduates under an E-Learning Methodology: A Case Analysis Oriented to Postgraduate Studies in the Environmental Field

Eduardo García Villena, Silvia Pueyo-Villa, Irene Delgado Noya, Kilian Tutusaus Pifarré, Roberto Ruíz Salces and Alina Pascual Barrera
Additional contact information
Eduardo García Villena: Higher Polytechnic School, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UNEATLANTICO), Isabel Torres 21, 39011 Santander, Spain
Silvia Pueyo-Villa: Department of Languages and Education, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UNEATLANTICO), Isabel Torres 21, 39011 Santander, Spain
Irene Delgado Noya: Higher Polytechnic School, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UNEATLANTICO), Isabel Torres 21, 39011 Santander, Spain
Kilian Tutusaus Pifarré: Higher Polytechnic School, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UNEATLANTICO), Isabel Torres 21, 39011 Santander, Spain
Roberto Ruíz Salces: Higher Polytechnic School, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UNEATLANTICO), Isabel Torres 21, 39011 Santander, Spain
Alina Pascual Barrera: Department of Project Management, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana (UNINI-MX), Campeche 24560, Mexico

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 9, 1-19

Abstract: The purpose of this article was to evaluate the level of satisfaction of a sample of graduates in relation to different online postgraduate programs in the environmental area, as part of the process of continuous improvement in which the educational institution was immersed for the renewal of its accreditation before the corresponding official bodies. Based on the bibliographic review of a series of models and tools, a Likert scale measurement instrument was developed. This instrument, once applied and validated, showed a good level of reliability, with more than three quarters of the participants having a positive evaluation of satisfaction. Likewise, to facilitate the relational study, and after confirming the suitability of performing a factor analysis, four variable grouping factors were determined, which explained a good part of the variability of the instrument’s items. As a result of the analysis, it was found that there were significant values of low satisfaction in graduates from the Eurasian area, mainly in terms of organizational issues and academic expectations. On the other hand, it was observed that the methodological aspects of the “Auditing” and “Biodiversity” programs showed higher levels of dissatisfaction than the rest, with no statistically significant relationships between gender, entry profile or age groups. The methodology followed and the rigor in determining the validity and reliability of the instrument, as well as the subsequent analysis of the results, endorsed by the review of the documented information, suggest that the instrument can be applied to other multidisciplinary programs for decision making with guarantees in the educational field.

Keywords: Sustainable Development Goals; environment; student satisfaction survey; measuring instrument; factor analysis; postgraduate degrees (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5112/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5112/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5112-:d:548205

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().