Ecological Compensation Standard of a Water-Receiving Area in an Inter-Basin Water Diversion Based on Ecosystem Service Value and Public Willingness: A Case Study of Beijing

Zhuoyue Peng, Hao Wu, Maohua Ding, Min Li, Xi Huang, Rui Zheng and Lin Xu
Additional contact information
Zhuoyue Peng: College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
Hao Wu: College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
Maohua Ding: College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
Min Li: College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
Xi Huang: College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
Rui Zheng: College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
Lin Xu: College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 9, 1-15

Abstract: Ecological compensation has recently gained significant attention as an economic incentive promoting natural resource management. However, there remain several challenges to its application. A key issue is the lack of a method clearly define the standard of ecological compensation. This study established an accounting methodology for the ecological compensation standard for the water-receiving area in an inter-basin water diversion in China. Beijing, a major water-receiving area of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, was used as an example of the application of this approach. First, the evaluation index of ecosystem service value of the water-receiving area was selected, then, emergy theory was used to calculate the increment of ecological service value based on the characteristics of each indicator. The ecological service value due to the project was calculated to be 3.898 billion RMB, while the willingness-to-pay by the public was estimated at 915 million RMB. Therefore, the increment of ecological service value was the highest standard of compensation, and the public’s willingness-to-pay was the lower limit of ecological compensation. The final compensation standard can be determined through negotiation between suppliers and beneficiaries under the leadership of relevant governments and water-transfer authorities. Thus, this study aimed to provide a scientific basis for the construction of diversified ecological compensation mechanisms and promote sustainable development of the region.

Keywords: ecological compensation; ecological compensation standard; ecosystem service value; willingness to pay; emergy theory; south-to-north water diversion project (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5236/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5236/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5236-:d:550267

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().