Regenerative Agriculture and Its Potential to Improve Farmscape Function

Tom O’Donoghue, Budiman Minasny and Alex McBratney
Additional contact information
Tom O’Donoghue: Sydney Institute of Agriculture, The University of Sydney, Eveleigh, NSW 2015, Australia
Budiman Minasny: Sydney Institute of Agriculture, The University of Sydney, Eveleigh, NSW 2015, Australia
Alex McBratney: Sydney Institute of Agriculture, The University of Sydney, Eveleigh, NSW 2015, Australia

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 10, 1-25

Abstract: Recent reviews have identified major themes within regenerative agriculture—soil health, biodiversity, and socioeconomic disparities—but have so far been unable to clarify a definition based on practice and/or outcomes. In recent years, the concept has seen a rapid increase in farming, popular, and corporate interest, the scope of which now sees regenerative agriculture best viewed as a movement. To define and guide further practical and academic work in this respect, the authors have returned to the literature to explore the movement’s origins, intentions, and potential through three phases of work: early academic, current popular, and current academic. A consistent intention from early to current supporters sees the regeneration, or rebuilding, of agricultural resources, soil, water, biota, human, and energy as necessary to achieve a sustainable agriculture. This intention aligns well with international impetus to improve ecosystem function. The yet to be confirmed definition, an intention for iterative design, and emerging consumer and ecosystem service markets present several potential avenues to deliver these intentions. To assist, the authors propose the Farmscape Function framework, to monitor the impact of change in our agricultural resources over time, and a mechanism to support further data-based innovation. These tools and the movement’s intentions position regenerative agriculture as a state for rather than type of agriculture.

Keywords: regenerative agriculture; sustainable agriculture; farmscape function; agricultural movement; landscape ecology; Jethro Tull; Intentions Principles Practices Indicators (IPPI) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5815/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5815/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5815-:d:813158

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().