What Makes the River Chief System in China Viable? Examples from the Huaihe River Basin

Zihao Zhang, Chao Xiong, Yu Yang, Chunyan Liang and Shaoping Jiang
Additional contact information
Zihao Zhang: School of Law, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Chao Xiong: School of Law, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Yu Yang: School of Law, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Chunyan Liang: School of Law, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Shaoping Jiang: School of Humanities and Law, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 10, 1-24

Abstract: Eco-environmental issues are a complex problem for the development of contemporary China, among which river water pollution control is one of the most challenging issues. In the continuous pursuit of river pollution control, the Chinese government has adopted the river chief system (RCS) model to appoint government officials as river chiefs of each section. This review first analyzes the water quality data of the Huaihe River basin over the past five years using Origin 2021. A violin plot shows that the water quality of the Huaihe River basin improved, and COD Mn and NH 3- N were significantly reduced. Secondly, this review analyzes the effectiveness of the river chief system according to the “embeddedness theory”, which argues that the river chief system has been integrated into the traditional hierarchy of environmental governance in China through institutional embeddedness to activate the vitality of the subject’s control and spatial embeddedness to eliminate fragmented watershed governance and promote governance capacity. Practical suggestions and initiatives were proposed based on the existing RCS, including the rule of law construction, regional collaborative management, and public participation to restore the local ecology.

Keywords: river chief system (RCS); political embeddedness; spatial embeddedness; watershed governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6329/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6329/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6329-:d:821573

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().