Overview of Environmental and Health Effects Related to Glyphosate Usage
Tomas Rivas-Garcia,
Alejandro Espinosa-Calderón,
Benjamin Hernández-Vázquez and
Rita Schwentesius-Rindermann
Additional contact information
Tomas Rivas-Garcia: Rural Sociology Department, CONACYT-Chapingo Autonomous University, Texcoco 56230, Mexico
Alejandro Espinosa-Calderón: Experimental Site Mexico’s Valley-National Institute of Agricultural and Livestock Research (INIFAP), Texcoco 56230, Mexico
Benjamin Hernández-Vázquez: Rural Sociology Department, CONACYT-Chapingo Autonomous University, Texcoco 56230, Mexico
Rita Schwentesius-Rindermann: Interdisciplinary Research Center for Integral Rural (CIIDRI), Chapingo Autonomous University, Texcoco 56230, Mexico
Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 11, 1-14
Abstract:
Since the introduction of glyphosate ( N -(phosphomethyl) glycine) in 1974, it has been the most used nonselective and broad-spectrum herbicide around the world. The widespread use of glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides is due to their low-cost efficiency in killing weeds, their rapid absorption by plants, and the general mistaken perception of their low toxicity to the environment and living organisms. As a consequence of the intensive use and accumulation of glyphosate and its derivatives on environmental sources, major concerns about the harmful side effects of glyphosate and its metabolites on human, plant, and animal health, and for water and soil quality, are emerging. Glyphosate can reach water bodies by soil leaching, runoff, and sometimes by the direct application of some approved formulations. Moreover, glyphosate can reach nontarget plants by different mechanisms, such as spray application, release through the tissue of treated plants, and dead tissue from weeds. As a consequence of this nontarget exposure, glyphosate residues are being detected in the food chains of diverse products, such as bread, cereal products, wheat, vegetable oil, fruit juice, beer, wine, honey, eggs, and others. The World Health Organization reclassified glyphosate as probably carcinogenic to humans in 2015 by the IARC. Thus, many review articles concerning different glyphosate-related aspects have been published recently. The risks, disagreements, and concerns regarding glyphosate usage have led to a general controversy about whether glyphosate should be banned, restricted, or promoted. Thus, this review article makes an overview of the basis for scientists, regulatory agencies, and the public in general, with consideration to the facts on and recommendations for the future of glyphosate usage.
Keywords: aminomethyl phosphoric acid; environment; herbicide; Roundup ®; Rangerpro ®; toxicity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6868/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6868/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6868-:d:831639
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().