Carbon Footprints and Life Cycle Assessments of Inhalers: A Review of Published Evidence

Brett Fulford, Karen Mezzi, Simon Aumônier and Matthias Finkbeiner
Additional contact information
Brett Fulford: Novartis Phama AG, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
Karen Mezzi: Novartis Phama AG, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
Simon Aumônier: Environmental Resources Management, London EC3A 8AA, UK
Matthias Finkbeiner: Institute of Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 12, 1-13

Abstract: Respiratory inhalers have a substantial impact on the carbon footprint of the healthcare sector. Environmental factors, including carbon footprints, are gaining importance in choosing inhalers once medical considerations have been addressed. This paper provides a review of the carbon footprint (CFP) and life cycle assessment (LCA) environmental profile of dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). Despite methodological challenges, our analysis reveals that the CFP varies between DPIs ranging from 359 gCO 2 e per inhaler (Enerzair Breezhaler ® DPI without digital companion 30-day pack) to 1250 gCO 2 e per inhaler (Seretide Accuhaler ® 50/500) and from 6.13 gCO 2 e per dose (Enerzair Breezhaler ® without digital companion 90-day pack) to 27 gCO 2 e per dose (Relvar Elipta 92/22). The breakdown of inhaler CFP by life cycle stage reveals that, although the use and end-of-life stages together contribute to most of the CFP of the MDIs, the largest contributions to the CFP of the DPI/SMI are made by the API and manufacturing stages of the life cycle. Although from a climate perspective our review aligns with the findings of Jeswani and Azapagic that DPIs have a lower CFP than pMDIs, we conclude that the performance against other environment impact categories depends on the design, choice of material and manufacturing process of the DPIs. The challenge of comparing the CFP of different inhalers can be made easier by the standardization of study boundaries and methods.

Keywords: life cycle assessment; environmental impact; cradle-to-grave; carbon footprint (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7106/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7106/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7106-:d:835498

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().