Does a Project Manager Assignment Process Affect Project Management Performance Indicators? An Empirical Study

Lone Seboni and Joseph Ssegawa
Additional contact information
Lone Seboni: Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Botswana, Private Bag UB 0022, Gaborone 00000, Botswana
Joseph Ssegawa: Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Botswana, Private Bag UB 0022, Gaborone 00000, Botswana

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 13, 1-17

Abstract: Practitioners in most firms use intuition to assign project managers to projects, despite this decision being one of the vital factors contributing to project management performance linked to sustainable utilization of resources. Extant research reveals the need to improve the project manager assignment (PMA) process. However, existing empirical studies are currently limited, thereby restricting our understanding of this process to a specific context. This study builds on this limited area by extending our understanding to other contexts. Questionnaires and interview surveys were conducted with 73 informants across 12 firms, covering several industries engaged in different types of projects. The results provide strong empirical evidence of unstructured and ineffective PMA processes that significantly affect sustainability issues in terms of a thriving firm such as project manager performance, project manager rewards, and project success. This empirical evidence is a contribution to existing project management knowledge for three reasons: (1) empirical testing of a project management theory for the first time, (2) falsification of the conventional understanding of the theory of PMAs by using the concepts of an index rather than a scale, and (3) adding depth to existing knowledge by extending our understanding of PMA processes.

Keywords: sustainability; project manager assignments; multi-project settings; project success; project manager performance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7637/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7637/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7637-:d:845499

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().