Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review

Adela Toscano-Valle, Antonio Sianes, Francisco Santos-Carrillo and Luis A. Fernández-Portillo
Additional contact information
Adela Toscano-Valle: Research Institute on Policies for Social Transformation, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 14004 Cordoba, Spain
Antonio Sianes: Research Institute on Policies for Social Transformation, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 14004 Cordoba, Spain
Francisco Santos-Carrillo: Department of International Studies, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 14004 Cordoba, Spain
Luis A. Fernández-Portillo: Department of Business Management, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 14004 Cordoba, Spain

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 13, 1-22

Abstract: Global governance challenges highlight the role of international institutions as problem-solving structures. Institutional design is, more than ever, relevant in this context. The academic literature on this issue is characterized by the existence of consolidated debates such as that of rationalism vs. constructivism, with a focus on making specific contributions to the rational design of international institutions. Koremenos, Lipson, and Snidal (2001) elaborated upon a series of cause-effect conjectures linking cooperation problems, considered independent variables, with institutional design features, considered dependent variables. This research aims to highlight the empirical evidence of the existing debate on this work by conducting a systematic review. Twenty-one quantitative research studies were collected through a screening and selection procedure and were subject to systematization. The findings showed asymmetric approaches to the rational design project, and agreements were the type of international institution that received the most attention from academia. Rationalism was supported by most of the body of literature. However, a broad subgroup of articles complemented this rational approach with other variables or schools of thought, such as those of constructivism and historical institutionalism. The results have relevance for the international institution design literature, as future avenues of potential research are underlined.

Keywords: cooperation problems; rational design; international institutions; global governance; constructivism; systematic review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7866/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7866/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7866-:d:850259

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().