Soil Organic Carbon Stocks under Different Land Utilization Types in Western Kenya

Esphorn Kibet, Collins Muimi Musafiri, Milka Ngonyo Kiboi, Joseph Macharia, Onesmus K Ng’etich, David K Kosgei, Betty Mulianga, Michael Okoti, Abdirahman Zeila and Felix Kipchirchir Ngetich
Additional contact information
Esphorn Kibet: Department of Water and Agricultural Resource Management, University of Embu, P.O. Box 6, Embu 60100, Kenya
Collins Muimi Musafiri: Cortile Scientific, P.O. Box 34991, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
Milka Ngonyo Kiboi: Cortile Scientific, P.O. Box 34991, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
Joseph Macharia: Department of Geography, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
Onesmus K Ng’etich: Department of Water and Agricultural Resource Management, University of Embu, P.O. Box 6, Embu 60100, Kenya
David K Kosgei: Department of Agricultural Economics and Resource Management, Moi University, P.O. Box 3900, Eldoret 30100, Kenya
Betty Mulianga: Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO), Sugar Research Institute (SRI), P.O. Box 44, Kisumu 40100, Kenya
Michael Okoti: Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO), Headquarters, P.O. Box 30148, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
Abdirahman Zeila: The World Bank, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
Felix Kipchirchir Ngetich: Cortile Scientific, P.O. Box 34991, Nairobi 00100, Kenya

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 14, 1-12

Abstract: The up-surging population in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has led to the conversion of more land for agricultural purposes. Resilient land utilization types that input carbon to the soil are key in enhancing climate change mitigation. However, there are limited data on different land utilization types’ contribution to climate mitigation through carbon input to soils. The study aims to quantify carbon stock across different land utilization types (LUT) practiced in Western Kenya. The following land utilization types were studied: agroforestry M (agroforestry with Markhamia lutea ), sole sorghum, agroforestry L (agroforestry with Leucaena leucocephalaI ), sole maize, and grazing land replicated thrice. To determine soil bulk density, SOC concentration, and soil carbon stock, soil samples were collected at depths of 0–5, 5–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm from different LUTs. A PROC ANOVA was used to determine the difference in soil bulk density, SOC, and SOC stock between different LUTs and depths. The four variables differed across the LUTs and depths. A high soil bulk density was observed at 0–5 cm under grazing land (1.6 g cm −3 ) and the lowest under agroforestry M (1.30 g cm −3 ). Conversely, the soil bulk density was low at 20–30 cm under grazing land. The 0–5 cm depth accounted for a high share of SOC and SOC stock under Agroforestry M, while the 10–20 and 20–30 cm depth accounted for the high share of SOC stock under agroforestry L. The study showed differences in SOC across the different depths and LUTs. The findings highlight that agroforestry L and agroforestry M are promising interventions toward climate mitigation through carbon induction to soils.

Keywords: soil organic carbon; land utilization types; Western Kenya; soil bulk density; agroforestry (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8267/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8267/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8267-:d:856878

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().