Providing a Roadmap for Future Research Agenda: A Bibliometric Literature Review of Sustainability Performance Reporting (SPR)

Oluyomi A. Osobajo, Adekunle Oke, Ama Lawani, Temitope S. Omotayo, Nkeiruka Ndubuka-McCallum and Lovelin Obi
Additional contact information
Oluyomi A. Osobajo: Aberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen AB10 7QE, UK
Adekunle Oke: Aberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen AB10 7QE, UK
Ama Lawani: Aberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen AB10 7QE, UK
Temitope S. Omotayo: School of Built Environment, Engineering and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS2 8AG, UK
Nkeiruka Ndubuka-McCallum: Aberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen AB10 7QE, UK
Lovelin Obi: School of Architecture and the Built Environment, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 14, 1-20

Abstract: The concept of sustainability reporting is now an essential tool through which organisations demonstrate accountability to their stakeholders. The increasing market pressure coupled with the awareness of the consequences of organisations’ activities suggests the need for organisations to report their sustainability credentials. Sustainability performance reports should provide adequate information on organisations’ social, economic, and environmental performance. However, the current process through which organisations communicate their sustainability performance to stakeholders is questionable and remains a significant concern. This study assessed the current state and direction of research on sustainability performance reporting by conducting a bibliometric literature review of peer-reviewed studies on sustainability performance reporting published between 1987 and 2022. The findings highlight the misconceptions between sustainability and CSR when reporting organisations’ sustainability performance. Furthermore, businesses and scholars prioritise reporting instead of communication with stakeholders. The observed lack of engagement with stakeholders indicates that the reported performance may not reflect the impact of business activities on the three dimensions of sustainability. Rather than adopting a one-way information dissemination approach, this study concludes that the desired performance can only be achieved through two-way communication with stakeholders.

Keywords: sustainability; communication; stakeholders; reporting; bibliometric review; sustainability reporting; sustainability performance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8523/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8523/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8523-:d:860842

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().