Exploring the Impact of Different Port Governances on Smart Port Development Strategy in Taiwan and Spain

Sheng-Che Lin, Hsien-Kuo Chang and Ying-Feng Chung
Additional contact information
Sheng-Che Lin: Department of Civil Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu City 30010, Taiwan
Hsien-Kuo Chang: Department of Civil Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu City 30010, Taiwan
Ying-Feng Chung: Taiwan International Ports Corporation, Ltd., Kaohsiung City 80443, Taiwan

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 15, 1-21

Abstract: With the rapid development of new technologies, such as automation, big data, and artificial intelligence, a port that utilizes these technologies can significantly improve its operational efficiency and make it economically more competitive. Despite its increasing importance, there is no standard definition of a smart port, resulting in each country having its own smart port development strategy. In this study, we explore how varied port governance of port authorities may impact the smart port development strategy. First, we established a set of evaluation criteria, using the Borda count and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, to obtain the key indicators for the development of smart ports in Taiwan. Then, we compared the preferred indicators of Taiwan’s smart port development strategy with those of Spanish ports. An obvious difference in this ranking comparison is found. This indicates that Taiwan’s strategy focuses on optimizing maritime safety, while Spain’s strategy focuses on improving operational economics. Finally, we analyzed the differences between the smart port development strategies of these two countries using the latest port governance classification table. The results of the above analysis are also verified by comparing the differences in port legislation between them. It turns out that the private sector is deeply involved in the operation of ports in Taiwan compared with Spain. Our main contribution lies in providing a clear pathway for developing a smart port in Taiwan in the future and investigating the reasons for different smart port development strategies in different countries.

Keywords: smart port; evaluation indicators; port governance; FAHP; port development strategy; Taiwanese ports; Spanish ports (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9158/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9158/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9158-:d:872051

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().