How to Assess Generic Competencies: From Sustainable Development Needs among Engineering Graduates in Industry
Tianzuo Yu,
Weiwei Shang,
Shaoxue Liu and
Jiabin Zhu
Additional contact information
Tianzuo Yu: School of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
Weiwei Shang: School of Marxism, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Shaoxue Liu: School of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
Jiabin Zhu: School of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 15, 1-17
Abstract:
Achieving many of the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals requires the active contribution of skilled engineers. Globally, however, there appears to be a mismatch between the sustainable competencies that engineering graduates possess and those required by industry. Closing this gap requires a reliable and valid means of establishing which competencies are of greatest importance to engineering practitioners. In this research, we developed a model of generic engineering competency and designed a scale comprising 55 skills in total. This instrument was then used to survey two samples of engineering graduates working in the Chinese industry, with 746 in the first round of surveys, and 1183 in the second. Using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), seven subscales were extracted from the data: (1) leadership, (2) engineering design, (3) professionalism, (4) problem solving, (5) lifelong learning, (6) technical theory, and (7) communication. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) demonstrated that the total number of generic engineering competencies was represented by a second-order, single-factor model that adequately fitted the data. Further, the Cronbach’s alpha values and composite reliability of the scale indicate its reliability. Overall, the evidence shows that the instrument offers a valid and reliable means of researching and assessing engineering education practices.
Keywords: generic competencies; engineering graduates; needs assessment; questionnaire development; instruments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9270/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9270/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9270-:d:874464
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().