The Development of the New Process of Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) and Its Application
Ching-Chow Yang,
Yung-Tsan Jou,
Ming-Chang Lin,
Riana Magdalena Silitonga and
Ronald Sukwadi
Additional contact information
Ching-Chow Yang: Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 320314, Taiwan
Yung-Tsan Jou: Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 320314, Taiwan
Ming-Chang Lin: Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 320314, Taiwan
Riana Magdalena Silitonga: Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 320314, Taiwan
Ronald Sukwadi: Department of Industrial Engineering, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta 12930, Indonesia
Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 15, 1-25
Abstract:
The Six Sigma program has been widely adopted by industries worldwide since the late-1990s due to GE’s successful implementation, though Motorola initiated it in 1987. Several quality experts, such as Juran and Feigenbaum and several researchers, have concluded that the poor quality in product design will cause vast and chronic costs, which the Six Sigma improvement may not eliminate. The focus of new product development is needed to transfer the quality improvement from the later phases of the Design Life Cycle to the early grades. It is necessary to adopt the “Design for Six Sigma” (DFSS) methodology to achieve the best performance in the early stages and focus on ‘prevention’ instead of ‘problem-solving. In this research, we develop a new DFSS process, including Define, Identify, Measure, Design, Optimize, and Verify (DIMDOV), based on the in-depth study of DFSS and the author’s rich consultant experience. The new DFSS process can be confirmed to be a robust methodology, used to assure the design quality of the product design and manufacturing process design by the application results.
Keywords: Design for Six Sigma; Design Life Cycle; Six Sigma; quality improvement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9294/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9294/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9294-:d:875036
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().