EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Study on Comparing the Performance of Fully Automated Container Terminals during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Bokyung Kim, Geunsub Kim and Moohong Kang
Additional contact information
Bokyung Kim: Port Research Department, Korea Maritime Institute, Busan 49111, Korea
Geunsub Kim: Port Research Department, Korea Maritime Institute, Busan 49111, Korea
Moohong Kang: Logistics and Maritime Industry Research Department, Korea Maritime Institute, Busan 49111, Korea

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 15, 1-13

Abstract: Major ports worldwide suffered from various problems such as labor shortage, port congestion, and global supply chain disruptions during COVID-19. To ensure stable operations of ports in such scenarios, one option is to adopt fully automated terminals. This study aimed at evaluating the performance of fully automated terminals compared with that of non-fully automated ones during the disrupted logistics due to coronavirus. Four ports that simultaneously operate both fully and non-fully automated terminals were selected. The performance of the target terminals was measured based on quantitative factors: throughput, number of ship arrivals, and berthing time. The results showed that the fully automated container terminals present better operational performance than the non-fully automated terminals. The former achieved large increments in the throughput, small decreases in the berthing time per ship, and increases in the number of ship arrivals. Moreover, there were economic benefits, revealing that the total terminal profit at the fully automated terminals was significantly increased, whereas that at the non-fully automated ones decreased based on berthing times. Therefore, fully automated terminals can be considered as alternatives for responding flexibly and stably during crises such as COVID-19.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; supply chain; automated container terminal; port performance; AIS data analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9415/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9415/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9415-:d:877826

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9415-:d:877826