Care Task Division in Familialistic Care Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Gender and Socio-Economic Inequalities in Austria and Slovenia

Ricardo Rodrigues, Stefania Ilinca, Maša Filipovič Hrast, Andrej Srakar and Valentina Hlebec
Additional contact information
Ricardo Rodrigues: European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, 1090 Vienna, Austria
Stefania Ilinca: European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, 1090 Vienna, Austria
Maša Filipovič Hrast: Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Andrej Srakar: Institute for Economic Research (IER), University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Valentina Hlebec: Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 15, 1-18

Abstract: Demographic aging has led to an increase in the number of people with multiple needs requiring different types of care delivered by formal and informal carers. The distribution of care tasks between formal and informal carers has a significant impact on the well-being of carers and on how efficiently care is delivered to users. The study has two aims. The first is to explore how task division in care for older people differs between two neighboring countries with different forms of familialism: Slovenia (prescribed familialism) and Austria (supported familialism). The second is to explore how income and gender are associated with task division across these forms of familialism. Multinomial logistic regression is applied to SHARE data (wave 6, 2015) to estimate five different models of task division, based on how personal care and household help are distributed between formal and informal carers. The findings show that the task division is markedly different between Slovenia and Austria, with complementation and supplementation models more frequent in Austria. Despite generous cash benefits and higher service availability in Austria, pro-rich inequalities in the use of formal care only are pervasive here, unlike in Slovenia. Both countries show evidence of pro-poor inequalities in the use of informal care only, while these inequalities are mostly absent from mixed models of task division. Generous cash transfers do not appear to reduce gender inequalities in supported familialism. Supported familialism may not fundamentally improve inequalities when compared with less generous forms of familialism.

Keywords: care tasks; home care; informal care; older people; inequalities; familialism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9423/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9423/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9423-:d:877708

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().