EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

University–Industry Technology Transfer: Empirical Findings from Chinese Industrial Firms

Jiaming Jiang, Yu Zhao and Junshi Feng
Additional contact information
Jiaming Jiang: Graduate School of Humanities and Social Science, Okayama University, 3-1-1 Tsushimanaka, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
Yu Zhao: School of Management, Department of Management, Tokyo University of Science, 1-3 Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan
Junshi Feng: Graduate School of Humanities and Social Science, Okayama University, 3-1-1 Tsushimanaka, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8530, Japan

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 15, 1-18

Abstract: The knowledge and innovation generated by researchers at universities is transferred to industries through patent licensing, leading to the commercialization of academic output. In order to investigate the development of Chinese university–industry technology transfer and whether this kind of collaboration may affect a firm’s innovation output, we collected approximately 6400 license contracts made between more than 4000 Chinese firms and 300 Chinese universities for the period between 2009 and 2014. This is the first study on Chinese university–industry knowledge transfer using a bipartite social network analysis (SNA) method, which emphasizes centrality estimates. We are able to investigate empirically how patent license transfer behavior may affect each firm’s innovative output by allocating a centrality score to each firm in the university–firm technology transfer network. We elucidate the academic–industry knowledge by visualizing flow patterns for different regions with the SNA tool, Gephi. We find that innovation capabilities, R&D resources, and technology transfer performance all vary across China, and that patent licensing networks present clear small-world phenomena. We also highlight the Bipartite Graph Reinforcement Model (BGRM) and BiRank centrality in the bipartite network. Our empirical results reveal that firms with high BGRM and BiRank centrality scores, long history, and fewer employees have greater innovative output.

Keywords: collaborative networks; technology transfer; China; university–firm collaboration; social network analysis; economic policy; economic statistics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9582/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9582/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9582-:d:880291

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9582-:d:880291