Carbon Sequestration in Fine Aroma Cocoa Agroforestry Systems in Amazonas, Peru

Malluri Goñas (), Nilton B. Rojas-Briceño, Cristian Culqui-Gaslac, Marielita Arce-Inga, Gladys Marlo, Elí Pariente-Mondragón and Manuel Oliva-Cruz
Additional contact information
Malluri Goñas: Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo Sustentable de Ceja de Selva, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru
Nilton B. Rojas-Briceño: Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo Sustentable de Ceja de Selva, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru
Cristian Culqui-Gaslac: Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru
Marielita Arce-Inga: Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo Sustentable de Ceja de Selva, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru
Gladys Marlo: Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo Sustentable de Ceja de Selva, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru
Elí Pariente-Mondragón: Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru
Manuel Oliva-Cruz: Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo Sustentable de Ceja de Selva, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 15, 1-12

Abstract: One way to mitigate climate change is by reducing atmospheric CO 2 levels with the establishment of agroforestry systems (AFSs) that can capture and store atmospheric CO 2 . This study therefore estimated the carbon sequestration in two components, aboveground (cocoa trees, other tree species, and leaf litter) and soil, in 15 fine aroma cocoa AFSs in Amazonas, Peru. These cocoa AFSs had a minimum area of 1.5 ha and were distributed into three age groups (each group consisted of five systems or farms): young cocoa trees between 8 and 15 years old, middle-aged cocoa trees between 16 and 29 years old, and adult cocoa trees between 30 and more than 40 years old. Generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) analysis followed by Fisher’s LSD mean comparison test ( p > 0.05) determined the significant level of total aboveground biomass and total carbon content in the AFSs’ components. The present findings confirm that Theobroma cacao , Mussa sp., Cordia sp., and Persea sp. were the most common species in all AFSs. Clearly, biomass and carbon content in Theobroma cacao and Cordia sp. increased slightly with age, while fruit species Mussa sp. and Persea sp. decreased with age. The total aboveground carbon stock in young cocoa tree systems (13.64 Mg ha −1 ) was lower than in middle-aged cocoa systems (20.50 Mg ha −1 ) and adult cocoa systems (24.86 Mg ha −1 ); nevertheless, no significant differences were found for any of the age ranges. On the other hand, carbon stocks in soil (up to 30 cm depth) in the AFSs ranged from 119.96 Mg ha −1 to 131.96 Mg ha −1 . Meanwhile, the total carbon stored by aboveground and soil components in adults cocoa systems (156.81 Mg ha −1 ) was higher compared to middle-aged cocoa systems (140.60 Mg ha −1 ) and young cocoa systems (133.59 Mg ha −1 ), although no statistically significant differences were found. Eventually, the CO 2 sequestration for young cocoa systems was 490.28 Mg ha −1 , and middle-aged and adult cocoa system recorded more than 500 Mg ha −1 of CO 2 . Furthermore, these data can further be used by national governments, local governments, and organisations of producers, particularly in accessing payments for environmental services, which may improve economic incomes and contribute to climate change mitigation by reserving biomass and sequestering C from these agroforestry cocoa systems.

Keywords: Theobroma cacao; Cordia sp.; fruit species; CO 2; climate change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9739/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9739/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9739-:d:882725

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().