Analysis of the Working Response Mechanism of Wrapped Face Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall under Strong Vibration
Honglu Xu,
Xiaoguang Cai (),
Haiyun Wang,
Sihan Li,
Xin Huang and
Shaoqiu Zhang
Additional contact information
Honglu Xu: Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China
Xiaoguang Cai: College of Geological Engineering, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe 065201, China
Haiyun Wang: Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China
Sihan Li: College of Geological Engineering, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe 065201, China
Xin Huang: Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China
Shaoqiu Zhang: College of Geological Engineering, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe 065201, China
Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 15, 1-22
Abstract:
A series of shaking table tests were carried out to explore the dynamic characteristics and working mechanisms of wrapped-face reinforced soil-retaining walls under strong vibration. Under the 0.1–1.0 g horizontal peak ground acceleration (HPGA), the damping ratio of sand shows a downward trend as a whole, so the acceleration amplification coefficient decreases with the increase of HPGA. However, when HPGA reaches 1.0 g, the acceleration amplification coefficient increases; the range of acceleration amplification coefficient at the top of the wall is 1.69–1.36. When HPGA is 1.0 g, the maximum cumulative residual displacement of the panel is 2.96% H, and the maximum uneven settlement of the sand is 3.57% H, both of which have exceeded the limit of the specification. With the increase of HPGA, the ratio of the dynamic earth force increment to the total dynamic earth force gradually approaches 50%. Since the reinforcement effect of geogrid is not considered, the predicted value of traditional earth pressure theory is different from the measured value. According to the Washington State Department of Transportation displacement index, the deformation range of wrapped-face reinforced soil-retaining walls is divided into three stages: the quasi-elastic stage, the plastic stage, and the failure stage.
Keywords: wrapped face reinforced soil retaining wall; shaking table test; deformation range; working response mechanism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9741/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9741/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9741-:d:882765
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().