EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Social Quality of Design-Build: Lessons Learnt from Higher Education

Franziska Schreiber (), Johannes Nöldeke, Špela Setzen, Cordula Kropp and Astrid Ley ()
Additional contact information
Franziska Schreiber: Institute for Urban Planning and Design, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
Johannes Nöldeke: Institute for Social Sciences, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
Špela Setzen: Institute of Spatial Conceptions and Fundamentals of Design, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
Cordula Kropp: Institute for Social Sciences, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
Astrid Ley: Institute for Urban Planning and Design, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 17, 1-13

Abstract: The need for a systemic transformation of the building sector is increasingly recognized, but much of the current discussion and actions focus on the creation of technical innovation, while the question of how to improve the social quality of buildings and building processes is largely ignored. Socially engaged architecture more broadly and design-build projects in particular represent an exception in this regard. Design-build studios have emerged as a new teaching method at numerous universities in North America, Europe and elsewhere to equip students with the skills needed to address pressing sustainability issues. Most design-build projects include an explicit claim to social relevance and change and opt for a co-productive process. However, the extent to which such practices have the potential to enhance the social (and, ultimately, the ecological) sustainability of buildings and construction processes has been insufficiently assessed. Based on a comparative analysis of five design-build projects carried out at the University of Stuttgart, this paper discusses critical factors that influence both the (social) quality of the design-build process as well as its (built) outcome and impact. The findings offer important insights for future design-build projects and their underlying need for revised training and teaching curricula to equip future architects and planners with the necessary knowledge and skills to act as process designers and facilitators and to shape a more people-centered built environment.

Keywords: design-build; socially engaged architecture; co-production; participation; social change; process learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10816/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10816/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10816-:d:901888

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10816-:d:901888