Do We Really Have to Scale Up Local Approaches? A Reflection on Scalability, Based upon a Territorial Prospective at the Burkina Faso–Togo Border

Véronique Ancey (), Jean-Michel Sourisseau () and Christian Corniaux
Additional contact information
Véronique Ancey: Joint Research Unit ART-Dev (Actors, Resources and Territories in Development), French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development CIRAD, Universities of Montpellier and Montpellier 3, French National Centre for Scientific Research CNRS, University of Perpignan Via Domitia, 34398 Montpellier, France
Jean-Michel Sourisseau: Joint Research Unit ART-Dev (Actors, Resources and Territories in Development), French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development CIRAD, Universities of Montpellier and Montpellier 3, French National Centre for Scientific Research CNRS, University of Perpignan Via Domitia, 34398 Montpellier, France
Christian Corniaux: Joint Research Unit Selmet (Mediterranean and Tropical Livestock Systems), French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development CIRAD, 34398 Montpellier, France

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 17, 1-17

Abstract: Scaling up has become an objective and an indicator of success across many fields. We challenge this norm in the field of agricultural development, where it has recently become widespread, offering a critique and alternative approaches by presenting work conducted on the border between Burkina Faso and Togo. Our territorial and prospective approach to cross-border transhumance draws on 30 years of statistical data, 61 interviews, a survey of 568 people and a demographic projection. A collective ambition grew out of the three workshops. Local cross-border debates and the subsequent dialogue between actors across territorial scales demonstrate that contextualized results can be valid without being “scaled up”. A real change in scale means going beyond individual perceptions by identifying and debating the connections between actors and with resources. Resource sustainability is considered through a collective process-based approach rather than through norms. To support practical work on sustainability, rather than fantasizing about perfectly generalizable objects of study or, on the contrary, getting wrapped up in a “small is beautiful” ideal, collective reflection should be encouraged on prospects for local actions. Where tensions run high—as in the territory that we study—these are all emerging resources in the negotiations of public action.

Keywords: territorial approach; prospective; pastoralism; transboundary; Burkina Faso; Togo; relational sciences; ecology of context; scalability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10977/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10977/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10977-:d:905436

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().