Externalities of Urban Agglomerations: An Empirical Study of the Chinese Case

Juan Yin, Zhong Yang () and Jin Guo ()
Additional contact information
Juan Yin: College of Intelligent Science and Control Engineering, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211169, China
Zhong Yang: College of Intelligent Science and Control Engineering, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211169, China
Jin Guo: School of Business, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 19, 1-19

Abstract: Urban agglomerations are playing an increasingly important role in regional economic development, and economic externalities are the key factors in the formation and development of urban agglomerations. According to different mechanisms, agglomeration externalities can be divided into pecuniary externality and technological externality, but the literature has not paid enough attention to the differences between them. Based on the case of China’s five representative urban agglomerations, this paper analyzes and compares the origins, mechanisms, and factors of the two types of agglomeration externality. The results indicated that the pecuniary externality of urban agglomerations originates from the intercity flow and allocation of production factors, and its mechanisms include the specialized production brought by industrial division and the cost reduction caused by scale economy. While the technological externality originates from technological spillovers between cities, its mechanisms include knowledge sharing and technology cooperation. Among China’s five representative urban agglomerations, the key factor affecting their pecuniary externality is market size, and the key factor affecting their technological externality is economic density. In other words, the pursuit of a larger market and higher economic density are the two main driving forces for the formation of urban agglomerations in China. By distinguishing core cities from peripheral cities in China’s five representative urban agglomerations, we also find that there is no significant difference in their pecuniary externality. However, their technological externality presents complex differences. There is still much room to improve the externalities of agglomeration in China’s urban agglomerations. For example, the flow of capital does not show a shift to more productive cities. R&D activities are still mainly concentrated within a city, not intercity, in urban agglomerations.

Keywords: urban agglomeration; pecuniary externality; technology externality; Chinese case (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11895/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11895/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11895-:d:920952

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().