EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Environmental Impact of Lowering Dietary Crude Protein in Finishing Pig Diets—The Effect on Ammonia, Odour and Slurry Production

M. Elizabeth E. Ball (), Sam Smyth, Violet E. Beattie, Kelvin J. McCracken, Ursula McCormack, Ramon Muns, Fred J. Gordon, Raymond Bradford, L. Alanna Reid and Elizabeth Magowan
Additional contact information
M. Elizabeth E. Ball: Livestock Production Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK
Sam Smyth: John Thompson and Sons Ltd., 39 York Road, Belfast BT15 3GW, UK
Violet E. Beattie: Devenish Nutrition, Lagan House, 19 Clarendon Road, Belfast BT1 3BG, UK
Kelvin J. McCracken: Devenish Nutrition, Lagan House, 19 Clarendon Road, Belfast BT1 3BG, UK
Ursula McCormack: Livestock Production Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK
Ramon Muns: Livestock Production Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK
Fred J. Gordon: John Thompson and Sons Ltd., 39 York Road, Belfast BT15 3GW, UK
Raymond Bradford: Preferred Capital Management PCM, 4 Greenpark Lane, Lisburn BT27 4EL, UK
L. Alanna Reid: Livestock Production Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK
Elizabeth Magowan: Livestock Production Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 19, 1-13

Abstract: Excess nitrogen excretion, ammonia and odour are environmental pollutants associated with pig production. Reducing dietary crude protein (CP) will lower the amount of nitrogen excreted, reducing the potential for ammonia emissions, if diets are adequately formulated to supply amino acids and production performance is maintained. Crude protein content in diets for finishing pigs has been lowered recently, but the quantitative effect of this reduction on ammonia, odour, and slurry output is not well-established. The relationship between ammonia and odour is equivocal, and the effect on slurry production is unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of lowering dietary CP on ammonia emission, odour emission and slurry output of finishing pigs. Thirty entire boar pigs were individually housed in groups of six, from 10 weeks of age (30 ± 3.0 kg) and offered standard diets. At 75 kg (±1.5 kg) pigs were assigned to one of three treatment diets; (1) 180 g/kg CP, 11.0 g/kg total lysine (High CP), (2) 150 g/kg CP, 11.1 g/kg total lysine (Medium CP), and (3) 130 g/kg CP, 9.0 g/kg total lysine (Low CP). After three weeks on the experimental diets pigs were moved, six each week, to individual calorimetry chambers to measure ammonia and odour emissions. Pigs were offered treatment diets ad libitum. At the end of the recording period, the pigs were removed from the chamber, weighed and feed disappearance recorded to calculate intake. The slurry in each chamber was collected and analysed. The reduction in CP in the diet from 180 g/kg to 150 g/kg resulted in a 22% reduction in ammonia emissions, and from 180 g/kg to 130 g/kg resulted in a 47% reduction ( p < 0.001). Slurry output from pigs offered the 130 g/kg CP diet was reduced by 39% ( p < 0.001) and dry matter increased by 35% compared to slurry from pigs offered the 180 g/kg CP diet ( p < 0.05). Water usage ( p = 0.017), slurry output and nitrogen and phosphate in the slurry ( p < 0.05, respectively) were found to decrease linearly with decreasing dietary CP content. There was no significant effect of reducing CP on performance or odour emission but hydrogen sulphide emissions decreased linearly ( p < 0.010) with decreasing dietary CP. There was a weak positive relationship between odour emission and ammonia (linear: R 2 = 0.25, p = 0.005) with odour emission reduced as ammonia emission reduced. Reducing dietary CP in finishing pig diets could reduce ammonia emissions, water usage and slurry and nutrient output from pig production.

Keywords: crude protein; finishing pigs; ammonia; odour; slurry (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12016/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12016/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12016-:d:922679

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12016-:d:922679