Despite Being Distinguished as the 2020 European Green Capital, Lisbon Has Lost Public Green Areas over the Previous Decade
Juscidalva Rodrigues de Almeida,
Gustavo Benedito Medeiros Alves,
Reginaldo de Oliveira Nunes and
Teresa Dias ()
Additional contact information
Juscidalva Rodrigues de Almeida: cE3c—Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE—Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
Gustavo Benedito Medeiros Alves: Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas—Campus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro 13506-900, São Paulo, Brazil
Reginaldo de Oliveira Nunes: Instituto de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza (ICEN), da Universidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira (UNILAB), Redenção 62790-000, Ceará, Brazil
Teresa Dias: cE3c—Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE—Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 19, 1-15
Abstract:
With the objective of assessing Lisbon’s environmental improvement and sustainable development, we measured the changes in Lisbon’s vegetation cover over the 2010–2020 timeframe considering three categories: public green areas (PGA), street trees (ST), and urban green infrastructure (UGI). We calculated the vegetation cover (m 2 ), vegetation cover per resident (m 2 person −1 ), and % of vegetation cover. PGA and ST covers were made available by the municipality, while UGI cover was estimated from the NDVI calculated from multispectral satellite images (Landsat 7–8). Since only the PGA cover decreased 2% (the ST and UGI covers increased 38% and 5%, respectively), Lisbon has lost PGA over the previous decade. The values of PGA per resident were below the minimum value of 12 m 2 person −1 at the city scale and in most parishes (19 parishes out of 24 in 2020). While the values of % of UGI were above the desired value of 30% at the city scale, in 2020 there were three parishes with values below the minimum of 5%. This information is important to prioritize measures that promote sustainable urbanization in those parishes. Our study raised many questions, suggesting the need to standardize the methods for measuring the urban vegetation.
Keywords: multispectral satellite images; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; public green areas; street trees; urban vegetation categories; urban green infrastructure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12112/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12112/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12112-:d:924542
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().