Energy Communities Implementation in the European Union: Case Studies from Pioneer and Laggard Countries

Elena Tarpani, Cristina Piselli (), Claudia Fabiani, Ilaria Pigliautile, Eelke J. Kingma, Benedetta Pioppi and Anna Laura Pisello
Additional contact information
Elena Tarpani: CIRIAF—Interuniversity Research Centre, University of Perugia, via G. Duranti 63, 06125 Perugia, Italy
Cristina Piselli: Department of Architecture (DIDA), University of Florence, via della Mattonaia 8, 50121 Florence, Italy
Claudia Fabiani: CIRIAF—Interuniversity Research Centre, University of Perugia, via G. Duranti 63, 06125 Perugia, Italy
Ilaria Pigliautile: CIRIAF—Interuniversity Research Centre, University of Perugia, via G. Duranti 63, 06125 Perugia, Italy
Eelke J. Kingma: Stichting Pioneer Vessel, Schoonschip, Johan van Hasseltkade 225B, 1032 LP Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Benedetta Pioppi: EValTech (R&D Department of Elettrica Valeri srl), via Somigni snc, Gualdo Cattaneo, 06035 Perugia, Italy
Anna Laura Pisello: CIRIAF—Interuniversity Research Centre, University of Perugia, via G. Duranti 63, 06125 Perugia, Italy

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 19, 1-17

Abstract: Energy communities are a promising strategy for a global energy transition. European Union (EU) regulatory frameworks are already established and clearly explained, aiming to develop as many projects as possible in the different European countries. Accordingly, it is necessary to present two different types of countries: the laggards and the pioneers, two categories that highlight the discrepancies in policy, bureaucracy, culture, and usage of alternative sources and technologies, such as renewable energy, towards the implementation of energy communities. This work compares two representative case studies to qualitatively understand the differences between laggard and pioneer countries: Italy and the Netherlands, respectively. The regulatory framework and the solid points/shortcomings of each country are explained first. Thereafter, an accurate description of the two selected case study communities and their different peculiarities is provided. Finally, the main similarities and differences are stressed to discuss the lessons to be learned in laggard and pioneer countries. Five pillars for the development and uptake of energy communities are identified related to regulations, economic benefits, technical limitations, sustainability, and social awareness. These outcomes suggest the importance of policy management, and stress the limitations of governance in helping policymakers and experts to support the energy transition.

Keywords: energy community; energy transition; EU framework; EU policy; laggards; pioneers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12528/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12528/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12528-:d:931127

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().