An Evaluation of the Uses of Different Environmental Enrichments on a Broiler Farm with the Help of Real-Time Monitoring via a Farmer-Assistant System

Fabian Spieß, Bernd Reckels, Christian Sürie, Monika Auerbach, Silke Rautenschlein, Ottmar Distl, Joerg Hartung, Jan Berend Lingens () and Christian Visscher
Additional contact information
Fabian Spieß: Institute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany
Bernd Reckels: Institute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany
Christian Sürie: Farm for Education and Research Ruthe, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 31157 Sarstedt, Germany
Monika Auerbach: Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559 Hannover, Germany
Silke Rautenschlein: Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559 Hannover, Germany
Ottmar Distl: Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559 Hannover, Germany
Joerg Hartung: Institute of Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30625 Hannover, Germany
Jan Berend Lingens: Institute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany
Christian Visscher: Institute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 20, 1-16

Abstract: Modern broilers are usually raised in barren environments in large enclosed halls. Various environmental enrichment elements such as perches, elevated platforms, and similar structures were proposed for these barns with the aim of improving the welfare and well-being of the birds. This study compares and evaluates three different types of environmental enrichment. In 2 identical barns, 8100 Ross 308 broilers were housed divided between a control group (CG) and a trial group (TG). In the TG, three types of environmental enrichment (perches, elevated platforms, and a combined structure) were used. A real-time monitoring device (FAS = farmer-assistance system) suspended from the ceiling was used in combination with single photographs to count the number of birds on the enrichment elements. In addition, the body weights of individual birds and their foot pad dermatitis (FPD) scores were collected at days 14, 21 and 28 in both barns. No differences in these parameters were seen between TG and CG. Birds showed highest preference for the elevated platforms (average 31.93 kg/m 2 ), followed by the combined structure (average 21.36 kg/m 2 ) and the perches (0.35 kg/m 2 ). Overall, this study shows that Ross 308 broiler birds significantly prefer elevated platforms over combined structures or simple perches.

Keywords: broiler; enrichment; animal welfare; performance; real-time monitoring (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13015/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13015/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13015-:d:939325

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().