EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Role of False-Claims Ban Regulation in Greenwashing of Firms with Imprecise Greenness Information

Zhengkai Wang, Debing Ni and Kaiming Zheng ()
Additional contact information
Zhengkai Wang: School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
Debing Ni: School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
Kaiming Zheng: School of Logistics and Management Engineering, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 20, 1-25

Abstract: The observation that firms are greenwashing in their advertisements to consumers has attracted regulatory false claim concerns; thus, we built a three-stage game theoretical model to explore how a firm’s efficiency in greenness information acquisition and a false claims ban (FCB) regulatory policy induce greenwashing (non-greenwashing) in the green advertising market. We solved the model with the concept of the perfect Bayesian equilibrium. Based on the PBEs, we obtained the following results. (1) A FCB regulatory policy is necessary to rule out any intentional greenwashing PBE. (2) In the presence of a strict FCB regulatory policy (with a large enough FCB penalty), if the precision of the firm’s observed signals is lower (or higher) than a threshold, uninformative non-greenwashing (both unintentional and uninformative non-greenwashing) PBEs arise, and the threshold increases in the FCB penalty. (3) A strict FCB regulatory policy and a high level of efficiency (regarding the firm’s greenness information acquisition) can (together) rule out greenwashing; the threshold of the efficiency of the firm’s greenness information acquisition is independent of the regulatory policy. Managerial implications are also discussed.

Keywords: greenwashing; false claims ban; advertising; perfect Bayesian equilibrium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13655/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13655/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13655-:d:949558

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13655-:d:949558