Measuring Environmental Resilience Using Q-Methods: A Malaysian Perspective

Hisham Tariq (), Chaminda Pathirage, Terrence Fernando, Noralfishah Sulaiman, Umber Nazir, Siti Kursiah Kamalia Abdul Latib and Haidaliza Masram
Additional contact information
Hisham Tariq: School of Science, Engineering & Environment, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT, UK
Chaminda Pathirage: School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK
Terrence Fernando: School of Science, Engineering & Environment, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT, UK
Noralfishah Sulaiman: KANZU Research, Resilient Built Environment (RBE), Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia
Umber Nazir: KANZU Research, Resilient Built Environment (RBE), Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia
Siti Kursiah Kamalia Abdul Latib: KANZU Research, Resilient Built Environment (RBE), Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia
Haidaliza Masram: KANZU Research, Resilient Built Environment (RBE), Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 22, 1-20

Abstract: Communities increasingly need tools that can help them assess the environmental risks they face to understand better their capacities in mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. Environmental resilience (ER) is a crucial feature of community resilience that is not adequately covered in the literature. This paper proposes an inclusive, participatory approach to achieve stakeholder engagement on the definitions, objectives, and indicators for measuring ER at the community level. This study uses a 5-step approach utilising Q-methods to contextualise a resilience index for Environmental Resilience (ER). An initial set of 57 indicators from 13 frameworks from the literature was reduced to 25 by combining the indicators of similar type, format and terminology. A total of 10 participants from two groups (academics and practitioners) took part in the interviews and Q-sort workshops in Malaysia in this study. Both stakeholder groups identified Ecosystem monitoring as one of the most critical indicators to understand ER, closely followed by rapid damage assessments and an effective communication system. The exercise also revealed marked differences between them regarding the importance of fair access to basic needs and services for citizens, a priority for academics, and the value of building green infrastructure, a priority for practitioners, with the most significant difference between the two groups on the importance of measuring the natural defences of a community. The Environmental Resilience Capacity Assessment Tool (ER-CAT), proposed in this paper, can be used by local governments and communities for engagement, discussion and consensus building to select the resilience indicators that are most relevant to them in their contexts.

Keywords: resilience indicators; participatory methods; Q-methods; community; disaster management; Environmental Resilience (ER); Malaysia; boundary objects; planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14749/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14749/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14749-:d:967418

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().