EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

First Report of Field Efficacy and Economic Viability of Metarhizium anisopliae -ICIPE 20 for Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Management on Tomato

Fred Peter Kabaale, Venansio Tumuhaise (), William Tinzaara, Geoffrey Turyasingura, Sevgan Subramanian, Fathiya Mbarak Khamis and Komivi Senyo Akutse ()
Additional contact information
Fred Peter Kabaale: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya
Venansio Tumuhaise: Department of AgricultureProduction, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyambogo University, Kyambogo P.O. Box 1, Uganda
William Tinzaara: Department of AgricultureProduction, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyambogo University, Kyambogo P.O. Box 1, Uganda
Geoffrey Turyasingura: Department of Crop Production and Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Busitema University, Arapai Campus, Soroti P.O. Box 203, Uganda
Sevgan Subramanian: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya
Fathiya Mbarak Khamis: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya
Komivi Senyo Akutse: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 22, 1-14

Abstract: Eco-friendly pest control options are highly needed in food crop production systems to mitigate the hazards of synthetic chemical pesticides. Entomopathogenic fungal biopesticides— Metarhizium anisopliae strains ICIPE 20 (oil-formulation containing 1.0 × 10 9 conidia/mL) and ICIPE 69 (commercialized biopesticide known as Mazao Campaign ® )—were evaluated against Tuta absoluta on tomato through inundative foliar spray and compared with the commonly used pesticide Dudu Acelamectin 5% EC (Abamectin 20 g/L + Acetamiprid 3%) and untreated plot. All the treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The field experiments were conducted for two consecutive cropping seasons in Mukono district, Uganda. Tuta absoluta infestation, injury severity on leaves and fruits, fruit yield loss, marketable fruit yield gain and cost–benefit ratio of the treatments were assessed. The results during both seasons showed a significant lower fruit yield loss in M. anisopliae ICIPE 20-treated plots compared to untreated plots, with a marketable fruit yield gain exceeding 22% and a cost–benefit ratio greater than 2.8 (BCR~3). Dudu Acelamectin 5% EC outperformed all the other treatments, but needs to be considered with caution due to its non-target effect and resistance development, whereas M. anisopliae ICIPE 69 performed the least well. In addition, the findings showed the high degree of efficacy and economic viability of these biopesticides as a potential T. absoluta control option in the field. However, it is important to further explore different formulations of these eco-friendly biopesticides, inoculum delivery approach, application frequency, their effectiveness in different agro-ecological zones and compatibility with commonly used pesticides in tomato production systems for sustainable management of T. absoluta .

Keywords: Metarhizium anisopliae; biopesticide; entomopathogen; Tuta absoluta; fruit yield loss; marketable fruit yield gain; cost–benefit ratio (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14846/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14846/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14846-:d:968828

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14846-:d:968828