EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Case Study of Delayed Action PIR Urinal-Controls in a University Setting and Their Impact before, during and after COVID-19

James E. M. Daly (), Devendra P. Saroj (), Jonathan L. Chenoweth and Thomas Parrott
Additional contact information
James E. M. Daly: Centre for Environment and Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
Devendra P. Saroj: Department for Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
Jonathan L. Chenoweth: Centre for Environment and Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
Thomas Parrott: Estates Facilities and Commercial Services, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 23, 1-12

Abstract: This study looks at the application of delayed action Passive Infrared (PIR) sensors in the control of water use for urinal flushing. In this we briefly review the literature on urinal controls before reviewing four different approaches to PIR urinal controls. Existing literature discusses some of the pros and cons of different types of urinal control. However, the literature does not consider the differences that occur within individual approaches, based on the way controls operate. This study was initiated at the University of Surrey during 2019 following a water saving audit, in an attempt to bring down one of their largest users of water. This paper therefore aims to identify the most effective way to reduce water consumption of urinal systems, through retro-fitting PIR control systems within the variety of settings across university campuses. This paper also reviews the different reductions achieved over periods of differing use, during term-time, holidays, COVID-19 lockdowns, and the ‘new normal’. It found that grouped delayed action flushing was the most effective form of urinal control for reducing water use. It, achieved a 59–64% adjusted reduction during non-COVID-19 periods, and a 35% reduction against the control group during lockdowns saving 98,000 L/day on average across the study.

Keywords: urinal; Passive Infrared (PIR); water conservation; water efficiency; campus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15506/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15506/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15506-:d:980247

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15506-:d:980247