Spatial Analysis of Soil Properties and Site-Specific Management Zone Delineation for the South Hail Region, Saudi Arabia

Ahmed M. Aggag () and Abdulaziz Alharbi ()
Additional contact information
Ahmed M. Aggag: Department of Plant Production and Protection, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia
Abdulaziz Alharbi: Department of Plant Production and Protection, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 23, 1-19

Abstract: Sustainable soil management with the appropriate understanding of soil characteristics is vital in maintaining and improving agriculture soil management. The objectives of the present study are to characterize the spatial variability of soil using the GIS technique and used agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) for the delineation of management zones (MZs) for precision agriculture. A total of 111 soil samples were collected from 37 soil profiles in systematic depths (0–50, 50–100, and 100–150 cm) from the South Hail region, KSA. Samples were analyzed for pH, ECe, CaCO 3 , available macro and micronutrients, and hydrological properties. The best fit models, using ArcGIS software, were J-Bessel for pH, Clay, bulk density (BD), and available water (AW); K-Bessel for EC and available N; Stable for CaCO 3 , P, K, Fe, Zn, Sand, field capacity (FC) and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks); Spherical for Mn and Cu; Gaussian for saturation percentage (SP); whereas exponential for permanent wilting point (PWP). The principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in six principal components (PCs) explaining 79.75% of the total variance of soil properties. The PC1 was strongly influenced by soil BD, FC, clay, PWP, Ks, and sand. PC2 was dominated by N, ECe, and CaCO 3 ; PC3 was dominated by pH; PC4 was dominated primarily by K and P, PC5 was mainly dominated by Fe; Mn, and Cu, and PC6 was mainly dominated by SP and Zn. Based on AHC, four soil management zones (MZs) cover 77.94, 14.10, 7.11 and 0.85% of the studied area. Management zone 1 (MZ1) and Management zone 3 (MZ3) are classified as moderately saline while Management zone 2 (MZ2) is classified as highly saline soils, greater than the limiting critical value for the sensitive crops. The potential solutions to reduce salinization in the area include: reducing irrigation, moving to salt-tolerant crops or applying humic acids to fix anions and cations and eliminate them from the root zone of the plants. Treating the area with diluted sulfuric acid to remove salts and reduce ECe to less than 2 dSm −1 , to get maximum productivity. This finding is diagnostic for determining the amount of fertilizer and irrigation water to be applied to soils in different management zones. Its emphasis’s the importance of site-specific management for long-term crop productivity and, as a result, reducing environmental hazards caused by uneven fertilizers and water applications.

Keywords: GIS; spatial variability; principal component analysis; management zone; agglomerative hierarchical clustering (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16209/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16209/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16209-:d:993758

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().