Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Single Stream and Multi-Stream Waste Recycling Systems

Costantino Berardocco, Hannah Delawter, Thomas Putzu, Larson Curtis Wolfe and Hao Zhang ()
Additional contact information
Costantino Berardocco: School of Integrated Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA
Hannah Delawter: School of Integrated Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA
Thomas Putzu: School of Integrated Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA
Larson Curtis Wolfe: School of Integrated Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA
Hao Zhang: School of Integrated Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 24, 1-16

Abstract: An increasing trend of moving towards single-stream waste management systems is occurring in many municipalities. This is because of the ability to process greater quantities of materials, minimize material management costs, and maximize recycling convenience and participation. Research on evaluating comprehensive sustainability (economic, environmental, and social) of the two streams is very limited. This study looks to gain an in-depth understanding of two waste management systems and assist in the decision-making processes of municipalities. To achieve this, the study provides a framework for evaluating economic, environmental, and social impacts as well as a sustainability assessment of single- vs. multi-stream waste management systems within the scope of a typical North American college town. A life cycle assessment framework was employed. The scope of the assessment includes production of materials, collection, sorting, and processes included in a material recovery facility (MRF). The functional unit is 1 ton of municipal solid waste. The case study was conducted on a North American college city during its transition from multi-stream recycling to single-stream recycling. The sustainability assessment result of the case study reveals that the single-stream recycling collection cost is slightly lower (USD 86.96/ton) than the multi-stream recycling collection cost (USD 89/ton). Additionally, the GHG emissions for the single-stream recycling system (10.56 kg CO 2 eq/ton) are slightly higher than for the multi-stream recycling system (9.67 kg CO 2 eq/ton). This is due to the complexity of the processes involved in the MRF. Nevertheless, recycling rate is the determining factor for life cycle GHG emissions and costs. Municipal solid waste policymakers could benefit from this study by using the framework and study results for tactical and strategic decision-making.

Keywords: life cycle sustainability assessment; recycling; waste management; single-stream recycling; multi-stream recycling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16747/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16747/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16747-:d:1002927

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().