EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Air Quality Impact Evaluation of Modular Construction Practices in Hong Kong and Singapore

Riqi Zhang and Yishuang Xu
Additional contact information
Riqi Zhang: School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK
Yishuang Xu: Manchester Urban Institute, School of Environment Education and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 2, 1-24

Abstract: As a new approach to construction practice, modular construction allows the building to be split into modular units and prefabricates them in factories, transports the units to the site, and assembles them into the whole construction through reliable connections. Whilst it is regarded to be the future direction in the development of the construction industry, Hong Kong and Singapore, amongst many other cities, both use modular constructions in public and private constructions. There have been many evaluations of the sustainability performance of a single construction using modular constructions, but the environmental impacts of implementing modular constructions on a city scale have been rarely explored. Few scholars have studied the impact of the application of this technology on the air quality on a small regional scale. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap by comparing and analysing the modular construction policies in Hong Kong and Singapore and evaluating the impact of the policies on air quality in the two cities. By using OLS and DID analysis, we found that the air quality can be affected by modular construction, though the impact was found to be limited. The modular construction policies had a positive effect on sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) emissions in both cities, and a negative effect on nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) and particulate matter < 10 μm (PM 10 ) emissions. Meanwhile, greenhouse gases (GHG) and ozone (O 3 ) varied between the two.

Keywords: modular construction; policy impact; air quality impact evaluation; difference-in-difference (DID) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/1016/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/1016/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:1016-:d:726517

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:1016-:d:726517