Investigating Business Potential and Users’ Acceptance of Circular Economy: A Survey and an Evaluation Model

Gianmarco Bressanelli, Nicola Saccani and Marco Perona
Additional contact information
Gianmarco Bressanelli: RISE Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Via Branze, 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy
Nicola Saccani: RISE Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Via Branze, 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy
Marco Perona: RISE Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Via Branze, 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 2, 1-22

Abstract: Circular economy is gaining attention in business and society to advance sustainability. This paradigm is particularly relevant for energy-consuming products such as washing machines, where alternatives to linear economy such as pay-per-use and refurbishment are gaining ground. To succeed, these business models should achieve consensus and acceptance among users. However, little attention has been paid to customers’ interest for circular economy business models so far. This paper aims to compare the economic and environmental impacts of pay-per wash and refurbishment business models, while investigating the degree of users’ acceptance and factors influencing it. A survey has been designed to collect users’ data regarding washing machine consumption patterns and acceptance rates of the circular business models. An evaluation model was developed to assess the economic and environmental impacts of pay-per-wash and refurbishment against a traditional linear model, fed with data from 279 Italian households collected through the survey. Finally, logistic regressions were carried out to investigate the influence of different customer, product, and usage factors on the acceptance rates of the two circular business models. Results show that, on average, pay-per-wash business models and washing machine refurbishment can guarantee environmental savings. However, only refurbishment generates economic savings for users. Moreover, only around half of the users’ sample shows a positive degree of acceptance of such alternatives. Respondent age has been found as a significant factor influencing the interest towards a refurbishment model, while the washing machine failures experienced by users and the relevance of the environmental gains achievable influence the acceptance rate of pay-per-wash models. Thus, when offering pay-per-wash schemes, suppliers should emphasize the information on the environmental benefits of this alternative, and that with such models they take over the responsibility and costs for maintenance and repair. On the other hand, providers of refurbished products should target younger consumers, who are less affected by a bias against second-hand goods.

Keywords: circular economy; life cycle assessment; life cycle costing; total cost of ownership; lifespan; pay-per-use; remanufacturing; washing machine; logit; logistic regression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/609/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/609/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:609-:d:719034

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().