EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparative Investigations into Environment-Friendly Production Methods for Railway Prestressed Concrete Sleepers and Bearers

Ruilin You, Jijun Wang, Sakdirat Kaewunruen, Meng Wang and Na Ning
Additional contact information
Ruilin You: Railway Engineering Research Institution, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China
Jijun Wang: Railway Engineering Research Institution, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China
Sakdirat Kaewunruen: Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
Meng Wang: Railway Engineering Research Institution, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China
Na Ning: Railway Engineering Research Institution, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 3, 1-22

Abstract: Prestressed concrete sleeper is a safety-critical track component widely used in ballasted railway tracks. The performance, endurance and quality of prestressed concrete sleepers can detrimentally affect the serviceability and durability of a railway track. An optimal production method is an important criterion underpinning quality and durability over the entire service life of prestressed concrete sleepers. At present, the research work of the sleeper mainly focuses on the dynamic load, bearing capacity and structural design method, etc. However, there exists a lack of research on the specific advantages and disadvantages of the sleeper production process and the improvement of the sleeper process research. This study is the world’s first to collect and analyse the technical data and characteristics of modern production methods of prestressed concrete sleepers, including the long-line system method, pre-tensioned long-mould flow method, pre-tensioned short-mould flow method, post-tensioned short-mould flow method and instant-demoulded short-mould flow method. The precautions for these prestressed concrete sleepers are highlighted in the paper as well. The research results show that the long-line system method, pre-tensioned short-mould flow method, post-tensioned short-mould flow method and instant-demoulded short-mould flow method have a higher automation level and lower efficiency than the pre-tensioned long-mould flow method. The production method of the pre-tensioned long-mould flow method has high efficiency and low cost of equipment, but more workers are needed. Through a comparative analysis, this paper also determines the environmental impacts and provide new references and suggestions for the development and progress of sleeper production technologies.

Keywords: prestressed concrete sleeper; production method; long-line system; mould flow method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1059/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1059/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1059-:d:727145

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1059-:d:727145