The Impacts of Tourism Stays on Residents’ Self-Reported Health: A Pan-European Analysis on the Role of Age and Urbanization Level

Anna Bornioli, Susan J. Vermeulen, Jeroen van Haaren, Riccardo Valente and Giuliano Mingardo
Additional contact information
Anna Bornioli: Erasmus Centre for Urban, Port and Transport Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Susan J. Vermeulen: Erasmus Centre for Urban, Port and Transport Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Jeroen van Haaren: Erasmus Centre for Urban, Port and Transport Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Riccardo Valente: Department of Geography, Rovira i Virgili University, 43480 Vila-seca, Spain
Giuliano Mingardo: Erasmus Centre for Urban, Port and Transport Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 3, 1-15

Abstract: Understanding the impacts of tourism on the quality of life of residents is a priority for the sustainable tourism agenda, and is especially relevant to the COVID-19 recovery period. However, the evidence is poor, and it is not clear whether the outcomes vary among sociodemographic groups. This study fills this gap by proposing a pan-European analysis of the effects of tourism stays per 1000 residents (as a measure of tourism pressure) on self-perceived health at a regional level, based on data from Eurostat, the EU-SILC (European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions survey), and the LFS (Labor Force Survey). Multilevel models with random effects were used, including three levels: region, time, and region–time. Results show that tourism pressure may benefit self-reported health but only among residents aged over 50 years old living in rural contexts, or over 65 living in low density urban areas. As for younger groups (under 50) living in high density cities, tourism is longitudinally associated with worsened self-reported health. These results, which are supported by instrumental-variable estimations, suggest that urban residents and younger groups do not benefit from tourism. This might be due to a number of side effects related to increased living costs, precarious labour, and conflicts related to public space. Therefore, our findings challenge the narrative that urban tourism universally improves residents’ quality of life. Considering the global urgency of creating healthier and more equitable post-COVID-19 cities and societies, tourism should be considered together with health and equity dimensions.

Keywords: tourism; health; sustainability; wellbeing; Europe; EU-SILC; multilevel model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1157/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1157/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1157-:d:729094

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().