EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Improving Effects of Afforestation with Different Forest Types on Soil Nutrients and Bacterial Community in Barren Hills of North China

Zhenlu Qiu, Cong Shi, Mingyuan Zhao, Kefan Wang, Mei Zhang, Tongtong Wang and Fuchen Shi
Additional contact information
Zhenlu Qiu: College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Weijin Road 94, Tianjin 300071, China
Cong Shi: School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tiangong University, Binshuixi Road 399, Tianjin 300387, China
Mingyuan Zhao: College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Weijin Road 94, Tianjin 300071, China
Kefan Wang: College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Weijin Road 94, Tianjin 300071, China
Mei Zhang: College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Weijin Road 94, Tianjin 300071, China
Tongtong Wang: College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Weijin Road 94, Tianjin 300071, China
Fuchen Shi: College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Weijin Road 94, Tianjin 300071, China

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 3, 1-17

Abstract: Afforestation can improve soil nutrient content and microbial community structure, increase soil carbon sequestration, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, at present, there is a lack of research on the low hills and mountainous areas in North China. In order to scientifically evaluate the effect of afforestation recovery with different forest types on the improvement of the soil ecological system, the Fanggan ecological restoration in North China was taken as the research sample, and the coniferous forests, mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest quadrats and broad-leaved forests, as well as the contrast of barren hills bushes were set to achieve the research goals. Research results of different forest types on soil nutrient and bacterial community in the Fanggan ecological restoration area have shown that afforestation with broad-leaved forests most obviously improved the nutrition properties and bacterial community of soil. (1) Broad-leaved forest afforestation obviously improved water retention and ammonia nitrogen content but reduced the content of available phosphorus and nitrate nitrogen of surface soil. It also increased available phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen, and nitrate nitrogen content of lower soil. (2) Broad-leaved forest afforestation significantly increased α-diversity of the bacterial community in surface soil, but only enhanced the Chao1 and ACE indices of lower soil. In addition, afforestation has also significantly changed the structure of soil bacterial community and β-diversity index. (3) Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia accounted for the highest proportion of soil bacterial community. Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia occupied higher proportion in broad-leaved forests than in other forest types, while the proportion of Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria was the opposite. (4) Afforestation decreased cooperation and increased competition among bacteria of surface soil as well as increased coexistence and rejection among subsoil bacteria. (5) pH, ammonia nitrogen, organic carbon, and available phosphorus have exhibited a significant impact on the structure of bacterial community in the surface soil, while the bacterial community structure of the lower soil was mainly affected by pH and available phosphorus. Results have fully demonstrated the positive effects of broad-leaved forest on the restoration of soil nutrients and microbial community structure. Meanwhile, the important combinations of soil physical and chemical factors affecting soil bacterial community structure were also explored. The results can provide scientific basis for revealing the mechanism of soil organic matter, nutrient and ecological function restoration by artificial afforestation, and also offer theoretical support and practical reference for the restoration of artificial afforestation in the hilly and mountainous areas of North China.

Keywords: vegetation restoration; soil nutrition; soil bacteria community; diversity; high-throughput sequencing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1202/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1202/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1202-:d:730006

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1202-:d:730006