Child Pedestrian Safety: Study of Street-Crossing Behaviour of Primary School Children with Adult Supervision

Malik Sarmad Riaz, Ariane Cuenen, Evelien Polders, Muhammad Bilal Akram, Moustafa Houda, Davy Janssens and Marc Azab
Additional contact information
Malik Sarmad Riaz: Civil Engineering Department—National University of Technology (NUTECH), Islamabad, Pakistan
Ariane Cuenen: UHasselt—Hasselt University, Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), School of Transportation Sciences, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Evelien Polders: UHasselt—Hasselt University, Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), School of Transportation Sciences, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Muhammad Bilal Akram: UHasselt—Hasselt University, Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), School of Transportation Sciences, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Moustafa Houda: College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Kuwait
Davy Janssens: UHasselt—Hasselt University, Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), School of Transportation Sciences, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Marc Azab: College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Kuwait

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 3, 1-15

Abstract: Road traffic accidents are the primary cause of injuries and fatalities among children. The current study focuses on children’s (un)safe crossing behaviour in a real traffic situation accompanied by an adult at a crosswalk in front of their school. The study aims to investigate if there are differences in crossing behaviour related to road infrastructure (i.e., one-way and two-way street, elevated and non-elevated street crossing), the gender of the child, and the effect of the accompanying adult’s behaviour on the child’s crossing behaviour. Primary school children from two urban schools in Flanders (Belgium) were observed for three days while crossing the street in front of their school in the morning and afternoon. A total of 241 child–adult pairs were observed. Descriptive analysis, Pearson chi-square tests, and binary logistic regression models were used to find differences between groups. More than half of the crossings exhibited two or more unsafe behaviours. Not stopping at the curb before crossing was the most unsafe behaviour, exhibited by 47.7% of children; not looking for oncoming traffic before and during the crossing was the second most unsafe behaviour, exhibited by 39.4% of the children. The only difference between boys’ and girls’ crossing behaviour was in stopping at the curb with girls 1.901 times more likely to stop before crossing as compared to boys. Adults holding hands of the child resulted in safer behaviours by children. The children not holding hands displayed significantly riskier behaviour in running or hopping while crossing the street and being distracted. The study reinforces the need to improve the transportation system through infrastructural interventions (elevated crosswalks), as well as educating and training children and the parents on safe crossing behaviour in traffic.

Keywords: traffic safety; children crossing behaviour; infrastructure; binary logistic regression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1503/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1503/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1503-:d:736218

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().