EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Comparative Study of the Impact of Negative Word of Mouth on Travel Intentions of Chinese and Korean Consumers in Tourism Destinations

Weijia Li and Ziyang Liu
Additional contact information
Weijia Li: Department of Global Business, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Korea
Ziyang Liu: Department of Global Business, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Korea

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 4, 1-14

Abstract: This article is based on reducing the negative effect of negative word-of-mouth on consumers’ travel intentions. We constructed a model of consumers’ travel intentions to explore the influence of negative word-of-mouth about tourist destinations on consumers’ travel intentions, examine the moderating effect of destination familiarity and the mediating utility of negative emotions, and conduct a comparative analysis between China and South Korea. Based on SPSS and AMOS analysis, we found the following: (1) Negative word-of-mouth has no direct positive effect on travel intention, and negative emotion plays a completely mediating role between negative word-of-mouth and travel intention, whereas high-intensity negative emotion is positively related to travel intention. (2) Travel destination familiarity has a moderating effect on negative word-of-mouth and negative emotions. Consumers with higher familiarity make external attributions and generate high-intensity negative emotions when they receive negative word-of-mouth; consumers with lower familiarity make internal attributions and generate low-intensity negative emotions. To improve consumers’ travel intentions, companies can enhance the relationship between tourist destination brands and tourists, adopt different management strategies for negative word-of-mouth according to the level of familiarity of destinations, and formulate tourism strategies.

Keywords: negative word of mouth; negative emotion; destination brand familiarity; travel intention (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2062/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2062/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2062-:d:747117

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2062-:d:747117